5 Jul 2022 6:19 am
I wouldn't think, of all people, somebody like you, FUZ, would support the revocation of Bobby Crimo's Constitutional 2nd Amendment gun rights because of some disturbing **** he posted on social media.FOS » 04 Jul 2022, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Your solution? Wait let me guess. Take guns away from sane people.
If you knew anything about mental health practice or mental health law you would know how complicated it would be to create legal guidelines for gun ownership based on an applicant's mental health history, that wouldn't end up in court every time.
For instance, most mental health professionals I know (we are the ones who would be used to write the language in any law) if asked "should anyone who has ever had a judge grant an order of protection against them, be able to get a gun license?" The answer from the mental health community would be a resounding "NO!"
Every **** mental health restriction would be challenged by somebody and dragged into court. Every one of them would end up appealed all the way to the SCOTUS. And this SCOTUS would say every time that you can't deny someone their Constitutional guarantees because of something somebody thinks they might do. And I think you would agree with such a SCOTUS majority opinion, wouldn't you FUZ.
So what's your **** plan for allowing only "sane people" to legally get their hands on a gun? There are places in this country where the court has decided that a citizen who is blind cannot be denied a gun permit.
What's your **** plan? You don't even know what "sane" means legally.